William Kentridge, Sculpture for Return, Bronze

William Kentridge, Sculpture for Return, Bronze

William Kentridge (NY, South Africa, b 1955), Sculpture for Return (Commendatore Naso), Bronze, initial signed WK and numbered 11/12 on the side of the base, when rotated the sculpture changes to form a nose.

“William Kentridge was born in 1955 in Johannesburg, South Africa where he currently lives and works. Often drawing from socio-political conditions in post-apartheid South Africa, Kentridge’s work takes on a form that is expressionist in nature. For Kentridge, the process of recording history is constructed from reconfigured fragments to arrive at a provisional understanding of the past- this act of recording, dismembering and reordering crosses over into an essential activity of the studio. His work spans a diverse range of artistic media such as drawing, performance, film, printmaking, sculpture and painting. Kentridge has also directed a number of acclaimed operas and theatrical productions. From the Beginning is about fragmentation and reconnection, the fragility of coherence. His three projections, Breathe, Dissolve, Return offer three different ways of shattering an image and reconfiguring it. Breathe, as the title implies, uses breath and wind to do this, with images made from confetti. Dissolve uses the instability of water to hold and break images. Return uses three dimensional sculptural objects which revolve into and out of coherence (as can be seen with the offered lot). The pieces were originally conceived for the La Fenice opera house in Venice, and Philip Miller has constructed the music using the sound of an orchestra tuning, and a singer, Nokrismesi Skota, singing an aria” (Marian Goodman Gallery)

Measurements: Height: 14 in. x Width: 31 in. x Depth: 8 1/4 in.

Auguste Rodin (French, 1840-1917) M?re et Fille Mourante (Mrs. Merrill and her Daughter Sally)

Auguste Rodin (French, 1840-1917) M?re et Fille Mourante (Mrs. Merrill and her Daughter Sally)

Auguste Rodin (French, 1840-1917) M?re et Fille Mourante (Mrs. Merrill and her Daughter Sally)

Signed ‘A. Rodin’ on base, to the right; also with ‘ALEXIS RUDIER/Fondeur Paris’ foundry stamp on edge of the base verso, to the left, bronze with verdigris patina
Height (with base): 32 1/2 in. (82.6cm)
Base: 3 3/4 x 27 1/2 x 27 1/2 in. (9.5 x 69.8 x 69.8cm)
Conceived in 1908-1910. Cast circa 1930s. Edition of 2 bronzes (plaster cast destroyed).

Large Triassic Petrified Wood Slab (Arizonan)

Large Triassic Petrified Wood Slab (Arizonan)

Large Triassic Petrified Wood Slab (Arizonan):

North America, Southwestern United States, Arizona, Late Triassic, ca. 225 million years ago. A massive and gorgeous slab of fossilized or petrified tree trunk sliced crossways and highly polished on one of the planar faces to showcase the broad interior rings of the tree – beautiful and astoundingly colorful! The exterior bark is fossilized, replaced by rough stone, while the smooth interior features incredible quartz, and agate formations that replaced the once organic material – creating a vibrant surface. The mesmerizing colors are dominated by warm hues of red, rusty orange, and maroon with creamy white, gray-blue, lilac, and mauve swirls and striations. The flat face is sealed to protect the surface and this slab could be mounted as a tabletop, but the beauty is simply enough to just use as a display piece! Size: 23.5″ Diameter x 1.25″ W (59.7 cm x 3.2 cm)

Fossilized trees from this time period come from the Chinle Formation of the southwestern USA, and the beautiful colors found in this formation – exemplified by the colors of this fossilized tree – give the Painted Desert of Arizona its name. Due to plate tectonics, this area was near the equator on the supercontinent Pangaea during the Late Triassic, which gave it a humid, sub-tropical climate. It was a floodplain below mountains to its south and a sea to its west; as a result, massive trees washed down from the mountains and came to rest in sediments that preserved them and fossilized them. The petrification process involves the rapid burial of the tree or pieces under sediment which prevents the usual decay. Flooding and volcanic activity are usually responsible for creating the layers of sand, silt, and ash needed to create the right types and amount of sediment. Mineralized water can then permeate through the wood, coating cell walls and filling the intercellular cavities which then fossilizes into stone. The detailed preservation of the wood, including knots, rings, and bark, are possible because the organic wood molecules become coated and surrounded with smaller silica molecules. Nine different species of tree have been identified in the fossilized deposits in the region; this example may be Araucarioxylon arizonicum, an extinct conifer tree (and the state fossil of Arizona). Fascinatingly, the Ancestral Puebloan people who lived in the region approximately 1000 years ago used petrified wood for making tools and even building houses!

Provenance: private Berthoud, Colorado, USA collection

All items legal to buy/sell under U.S. Statute covering cultural patrimony Code 2600, CHAPTER 14, and are guaranteed to be as described or your money back.

A Certificate of Authenticity will accompany all winning bids.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to recent increases of shipments being seized by Australian & German customs (even for items with pre-UNESCO provenance), we will no longer ship most antiquities and ancient Chinese art to Australia & Germany. For categories of items that are acceptable to ship to Australia or Germany, please contact us directly or work with your local customs brokerage firm.

Display stands not described as included/custom in the item description are for photography purposes only and will not be included with the item upon shipping.

#168929
Condition
Professionally cut and polished with clear sealant over polished face. Other face is covered in protective sealant and the interior rings are not visible. Minor surface chips and abrasions to exterior bark diameter. Amazing coloration throughout.

Signed Tim Yanke Painting – Paramount (2020)

Signed Tim Yanke Painting - Paramount (2020)

Signed Tim Yanke Painting – Paramount (2020):

Tim Yanke (American, b. 1962). “Paramount” acrylic on canvas, 2020. Hand-signed in pigment on lower right by the artist. A striking painting by American abstract artist, Tim Yanke, presenting his signature blend of a gestural application of bold colors – in this case fiery oranges and reds with black and white – and text. Yanke’s technique is organic. Oftentimes approaching the canvas “with an idea in mind” but only selecting colors once he has begun, he enjoys working with a variety of media, oftentimes including written words, as we see in this painting, but leaving the interpretation of these messages up to the viewer. Yanke has pointed to the influences of Abstract Expressionists such as Willem de Kooning, Robert Motherwell, Wassily Kandinsky, Cy Twombly, and Jackson Pollock. In addition, music is an important part of Yanke’s creative process, enabling him to “free his mind and unlock his raw, creative potential, which in turn helps him capture the flow and rhythm of whatever he is working on.” Size: 17.375″ L x 23.375″ W (44.1 cm x 59.4 cm) Size of frame: 31.5″ L x 37.375″ W (80 cm x 94.9 cm)

Tim Yanke earned his fine arts degree from the University of Texas in Denton. Yanke’s honors include being selected as an “Artist Resident” for the Brush Creek Foundation for the Arts in Saratoga, Washington in 2012 as well as the official artist of the Amelia Island Jazz Festival in Florida in 2015. In addition, Yanke has generously donated more than twenty of his American flag pieces known as “Yankee Doodles” to Habitat for Humanity homeowners in Oakland County.

Provenance: private R. H. collection, Littleton, Colorado, USA

All items legal to buy/sell under U.S. Statute covering cultural patrimony Code 2600, CHAPTER 14, and are guaranteed to be as described or your money back.

A Certificate of Authenticity will accompany all winning bids.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to recent increases of shipments being seized by Australian & German customs (even for items with pre-UNESCO provenance), we will no longer ship most antiquities and ancient Chinese art to Australia & Germany. For categories of items that are acceptable to ship to Australia or Germany, please contact us directly or work with your local customs brokerage firm.

Display stands not described as included/custom in the item description are for photography purposes only and will not be included with the item upon shipping.

#166886
Condition
The painting has not been examined outside the frame but appears to be in excellent condition. It is hand-signed in pigment on the lower right. Frame is in excellent condition save a few minor scuffs to the peripheries. It is wired for suspension and ready to display.

19th C. Chinese Qing Wood Corbels w/ Money Toad

19th C. Chinese Qing Wood Corbels w/ Money Toad

19th C. Chinese Qing Wood Corbels w/ Money Toad:

East Asia, China, Qing Dynasty, ca. 19th to early 20th century CE. This is a fine pair of hand-carved architectural panels or corbels featuring Liu Haichan, a transcendent immortal and the embodiment of wealth or prosperity. These panels are symmetrical with similarly intricate openwork motifs throughout. The jovial Liu Haichan is depicted with his characteristic string of square holed coins – oversized to be visible when viewing from below. He is accompanied by the three-legged money toad known as jin chan, an amphibian of good fortune, which is leaping to catch a coin. Liu Haichan used the toad for transportation, but the disgruntled creature would often escape and Liu Haichan would lure him back with his string of coins. This motif is known as “Liu Hai sporting with the toad,” and is an auspicious symbol that was popular image to use on businesses and homes to ensure that wealth and prosperity found its way inside the building. Size of each (both are relatively similar): 15″ L x 3.75″ W x 24.5″ H (38.1 cm x 9.5 cm x 62.2 cm); 26″ H (66 cm) on included custom stand.

Provenance: private Hawaii, USA collection, between 1995 to 2010

All items legal to buy/sell under U.S. Statute covering cultural patrimony Code 2600, CHAPTER 14, and are guaranteed to be as described or your money back.

A Certificate of Authenticity will accompany all winning bids.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to recent increases of shipments being seized by Australian & German customs (even for items with pre-UNESCO provenance), we will no longer ship most antiquities and ancient Chinese art to Australia & Germany. For categories of items that are acceptable to ship to Australia or Germany, please contact us directly or work with your local customs brokerage firm.

Display stands not described as included/custom in the item description are for photography purposes only and will not be included with the item upon shipping.

#168906
Condition
Signs of age and exposure to elements, but overall great condition with expected chips and nicks to high pointed areas. Stable pressure fissures and some softening to finer details, but motifs are clear and very good. Nice patina.

[Americana] [Jefferson, Thomas, and John Adams] Printed 1796 Presidential Campaign Handbill

[Americana] [Jefferson, Thomas, and John Adams] Printed 1796 Presidential Campaign Handbill

[Americana] [Jefferson, Thomas, and John Adams] Printed 1796 Presidential Campaign Handbill:

Extremely rare campaign handbill from the 1796 United States Presidential election, the first to feature emerging political parties

“Who drew the Declaration of Independence, that great Charter of our Enfranchisement? Answer–Thomas Jefferson”

No place, no date (Maryland, ca. November-December, 1796). Small bifolium sheet, 7 3/4 x 4 3/4 in. (197 x 121 mm). Printed campaign handbill; uncut sheet including another copy of same. Creasing from when folded; toned and lightly spotted; bottom edge worn; small open tear at fold on second leaf.

An extremely rare, and unrecorded, pro-Thomas Jefferson handbill from the 1796 presidential election. This was only the third presidential election in the history of the United States, and the first one to be contested by nascent political parties, the Democratic-Republicans and the Federalists. It was the first presidential election where partisan affiliation began to play a significant role, and it was the first to use campaigning tactics to influence voting, such as the printing of handbills and pamphlets such as this, and the use of party operatives to organize campaign strategy and voting drives. The election pitted former Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson against Vice President John Adams. It is the only presidential election that saw the president and vice president elected from opposing parties, with Adams elected president and Jefferson vice president.

This handbill takes the form of a catechism in support of Thomas Jefferson, featuring ten questions and ten answers. In the 1790s the catechistic format was often used as a pedagogical tool by political activists to teach voters to be partisans and party members, as it was a format familiar to most lay readers. The text highlights Jefferson’s achievements as a statesman, politician, and defender of America from foreign influence, while casting Adams and his Federalist colleagues–specifically Alexander Hamilton–as monarchists and “miscreants.” While the handbill is not dated, the contents of it, as well as its appearance in newspapers of the time, place its printing in the fall of 1796. References to various issues that were important in the 1796 election are mentioned, for example, in the fourth question, the Neutrality Proclamation of 1793; in the fifth question, the Genêt Affair; in the sixth question the trial of Gideon Henfield; in the seventh question, the 1791 Declaration of Pillnitz. Other issues are referred to–although not unique to the 1796 election, as they were also campaign issues in 1800–such as Thomas Jefferson’s term as the governor of Virginia and his purported dereliction of duty during the American Revolution in the face of invading British troops, in question eight (the first public charge of cowardice by Jefferson was made by Virginia lawyer Charles Simms in September 1796), and Adams’s and Hamilton’s supposed support of monarchy and hereditary government in the last question (stemming from Adams’s Defence of the Constitutions of the Government of the United States of America in 1787, and Hamilton’s June 18, 1787 speech at the Constitutional Convention).

In The First Presidential Contest: 1796 and the Founding of American Democracy, historian Jeffrey L. Pasley writes, “One of the most economical and effective pro-Jefferson texts produced anywhere in 1796 came out of the Eastern Shore town of Easton [Maryland]. This was a catechism that succinctly taught the gospel of Thomas Jefferson as it would be passed down for generations, starting with the sacred text (Declaration of Independence) that up until this time had been only sporadically presented as a national mission statement and had not even been widely credited to Jefferson.” Pasley locates four newspapers throughout the country that reprinted the text of this handbill: the first appearing in Easton in James Cowan’s Maryland Herald and Eastern Shore Intelligencer, on November 8, 1796; followed by the Washington Spy, November 30, 1796; the Charleston City Gazette, December 3, 1796; the Portsmouth New Hampshire Gazette, December 10, 1796. We have found an additional printing in the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, Friday November 18, 1796, the de facto national paper for the Democratic-Republican press that supported Jefferson. One noticeable difference between all of these published versions and the handbill is that Alexander Hamilton’s last name is misspelled “Hambleton” in the handbill.

This handbill was discovered in a residence on Ripley Plantation, located near Church Hill, Queen Anne’s County, Maryland, 30 miles north of Easton where the text first appeared in the Maryland Herald and Eastern Shore Intelligencer. The grounds of the plantation have been in the same family since the 17th-century, and the home where it was found dates to the very early 19th-century, it was demolished in 2021.

This handbill is the only known surviving example of its kind, and until now the text has only survived in newspaper printings like the above. Although it would have been distributed by hand, the fact that this example is an uncut printing of two leads us to believe it was never circulated.

Background

The election of 1796 was the first great test of the presidential succession system for the young nation. The first two presidential elections, in 1788 and 1792, saw George Washington elected without competition but by the end of 1796 the political climate in the country had dramatically changed. The country’s first political parties were beginning to emerge on a national scale due largely to reactions to events that occurred during Washington’s two terms. Points of contention developed around his administration’s fiscal policies, orchestrated by Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton. The passage of the Jay Treaty in 1794 with Great Britain, his administration’s neutrality with France after the outbreak of the French Revolution, and France’s subsequent wars with European monarchies, were key points creating wider partisan divide. As a result, New England-based Federalists, largely in support of these foreign and domestic policies, organized against the largely southern-based Democratic-Republicans, who were against these fiscal measures and viewed the Jay Treaty with disdain and sought closer ties with France. Up until two months before the November election neither group was entirely sure whether Washington would seek a third term, but this definitively changed on September 19, 1796, when his Farewell Address was printed in Philadelphia’s American Daily Advertiser. Written with the assistance of Hamilton and congressman James Madison, Washington’s address warned against foreign alliances, domestic regionalism, and political partisanship, and urged the American people to stay united for the sake of the Union’s perpetuity. His announcement made it certain that the upcoming presidential election would be the first nationally competitive contest in the history of the country, but his warnings against factionalism fell on deaf ears. The Federalists rallied around Vice President John Adams as their candidate of choice, while Democratic-Republicans rallied around former Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson. At this time neither Adams nor Jefferson campaigned themselves, as it was deemed politically improper, so campaigning was left to a newly organizing group of partisan operatives. Partisan mudslinging was immediate and increasingly bitter during the short campaign as newspaper articles, pamphlets, and handbills, often painted the candidates in stark and unflattering terms. Jefferson was often vilified by Federalist-aligned operatives as a Francophile, atheist, and coward, while Adams was accused by Democratic-Republicans of being an Anglophile and a monarchist who secretly wished to establish a family dynasty. Campaigning was so widespread, emotionally charged, and novel for the period, that it came as a shock to Adams’s wife, Abigail. She wrote in a November 11 letter to her son John Quincy (two days after the first newspaper appearance of this handbill’s text), “…the News papers inform us that the most active measures are taking by the Democratic Societies to ensure success to their Candidate, by circulating Hand Bill containing libels on mr Adams. Gate post, Doors of Houses & posts are coverd through the Country, a right Gallic measure. Men are hired to ride through the Country with Bags of these Hand Bills. I do not however learn that they contain any thing but to represent him as attach’d to Monarchy to Tittles &c that he is Enemical to the Rights of the people, all of which these very engines of Mischief know to be false.” Handbills condemning Adams had begun to appear in Boston as early as September 24, but were most frequently found in the battleground state of Pennsylvania, which was inundated with printed campaign matter on a scale never seen before.

Maryland was a battleground state during this election as it occupied a unique borderline position between the Northern and Southern sectional lines, and with ten electoral votes, it was a key state to help determine the contest. Their election process at the time saw eligible voters (landowning men) choose electors by popular vote, organized by district, with the winning electors then voting for their presidential candidate of choice. Maryland was one of only seven states to hold popular elections like this at the time. The state legislatures in the other nine states directly chose their electors. Federalists and Democratic-Republicans both organized campaign efforts in Baltimore, Annapolis, and throughout the countryside in order to sway eligible voters to choose their elector candidate, with elector elections occurring from November 9-12. It was common at the time for elector candidates in rural areas in Maryland to campaign on their own behalf to their neighbors and people within their district, often through various means of persuasion, and sometimes, coercion. Maryland had its own partisan operatives campaigning on behalf of their candidate of choice. Adams protégé and Federalist congressman William Vans Murray of the eighth district swayed voters with his Short Vindication, a written defense of Adams’s Defence of the American Constitutions. Conversely, Jefferson elector candidate, Gabriel Duvall, rode through the Maryland countryside near Annapolis, sounding the alarm about Adams’s monarchical sympathies, using Adams’s Defence as evidence, to anyone that would listen. This handbill was presumably one of many handed out by partisan operatives, supporters, or a local elector, in or near Talbot County, Queen’s Anne County, and the surrounding area, sometime before the elector-elections in early November, or on December 7, 1796, when the winning electors met to cast their vote for the presidency. It is also possible that this was handed out at a polling place in those areas. Talbot County and Queen Anne’s County both fell within Maryland’s eighth district, and saw Federalist-aligned elector candidate John Roberts run against Democratic-Republican-aligned Robert Wright. The election saw the state split their vote, with Adams winning seven electoral votes, Jefferson four, and the remaining nine split amongst other candidates. Roberts won Talbot County for Adams, where the text first appeared in newspaper form, while Wright won Queen Anne’s County for Jefferson, where this handbill was discovered. Ultimately the election was settled by the thinnest of margins and saw Adams ascend to the presidency with 71 total electoral votes, one more electoral vote than needed to achieve a majority. Jefferson came in second place with 68 votes, and, through a quirk in the electoral rules of the day, was elected vice president.

Any surviving handbills from this election are rare.

[Americana] [First Catholic Bible] The Holy Bible, Translated from the Latin Vulgate: Diligently Compared with the Hebrew, Greek, and Other Editions,

[Americana] [First Catholic Bible] The Holy Bible, Translated from the Latin Vulgate: Diligently Compared with the Hebrew, Greek, and Other Editions,

[Americana] [First Catholic Bible] The Holy Bible, Translated from the Latin Vulgate: Diligently Compared with the Hebrew, Greek, and Other Editions :

In Divers Languages; and First Published by the English College at Doway, Anno 1609
The First Catholic Bible Printed in the United States

Philadelphia: Carey, Stewart, and Co., 1790. Two volumes in one. First American edition. 4to, 10 1/8 x 8 in. (257 x 203 mm). viii, 487, (5); 280, *[281-284]*, 281-490 pp. Printed in two columns; without separate title-page for second part, as issued. Contemporary brown calf, stamped in blind, boards, joints and extremities rubbed and worn, rear board starting; all edges trimmed; extensive ownership signatures belonging to the Cauffman family of Philadelphia and Roxborough, on front paste-down, front free endpaper, title-page, and at head of the first page of The Book of Genesis, dating from 1796-1985; foxing and soiling to most text leaves; pencil sketches on interior blanks; repair in bottom corner, pp. 91/92 in first part; tear in upper gutter, pp. 473/474 in first part; tear in bottom gutter, pp. 303/304 in second part; MS. on verso of rear blank; lacking rear endpaper; scattered marginalia; book-plate of Theo. F. Cauffman, Warden of St. Timothy’s Church, Roxborough, ca. 1860s, on front paste-down. Evans 22349; Sabin 5166; Hills 23; Herbert 1343; ESTC W38299

Rare first American edition of the Douay version of the Bible, the first Catholic Bible printed in the United States, which was based on the second edition Catholic Bible by English Bishop Richard Challoner of 1763-64. “In 1789, Mr. Carey announced plans to publish a translation of the Vulgate Bible if he could secure 400 subscribers. The actual number secured was 471. The total number of the edition printed is not known; however, it could not have been much over the number of subscriptions as the demand for a Catholic Bible was small in the United States at that time. The undertaking was therefore an expensive one for the size of the edition, and it was first decided to print the Bible in 48 parts, to be issued weekly. Though it is generally assumed that a few parts were printed (the designation ‘Vol I’ does not appear on any signatures on the first 89 pages of text), Carey abandoned the scheme and formed the publishing firm of Carey, Stewart & Co., which published the Bible on Dec 1, 1790. The type was specially cast by Baine and Co., Philadelphia. It is now the rarest of the notable early American editions of the Bible.” (Hills, The English Bible in America)

This rare Catholic Bible features a fascinating near-200 year manuscript record of the Cauffman family of Philadelphia and Roxborough. It contains 10 ownership signatures of the various family members, starting with the original owner, Joseph Cauffman, in 1796, and ends with Tyler Hart Bradbury, 1985. According to the Records of the American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia, Cauffman was the founder of the Cauffman family line in the United States. Born in Strasburg, Germany in 1720, he moved to Philadelphia in 1749. He is known to have contributed funds to the construction of St. Mary’s church in Philadelphia, and was later a trustee. He also raised money to found a Catholic Academy in Georgetown, Washington, D.C., and invested heavily in land in Philadelphia, Chester, Bucks, Westmoreland, Indiana, and Montgomery counties in Pennsylvania. He married Anna Catherine around 1754, died in Philadelphia in 1807, and was interred in St. Mary’s.

Rare. We can locate only six other copies of this bible in the auction record since 1898.

[Americana] [Northwest Territory] Land Ordinance of 1785

rare printing establishing America’s public land system

[Americana] [Northwest Territory] Land Ordinance of 1785:

A rare printing establishing America’s public land system, and the mechanism for surveying and selling land in the Western Frontier

“BE IT ORDAINED BY THE UNITED STATES IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED, That the territory ceded by the individual states, to the United States, which has been purchased of the Indian inhabitants, shall be disposed of in the following manner…”

(New York, 1785). 4 pp. Bifolium sheet, 14 1/4 x 8 in. (362 x 203 mm). Printed Confederation Congress ordinance, being “May 20, 1785, An Ordinance for ascertaining the Mode of Disposing of LANDS in the Western Territory” on second through fourth pages, and with Land Ordinance of 1784 of April 23, 1784, printed in full on first page. Signed in type on page four by President of the Congress of the Confederation, Richard Henry Lee, and Secretary Charles Thomson. Fore-edge trimmed; horizontal crease from original fold, 1 3/4 in. separation traversing center of same; contemporary docketing below Lee’s signature on fourth page: “Act 23rd April 1784/for temporary government/of western territory–Ordinance for dispo-/sing of western terry/May 20th 1785”; spotting in top margin; a few scattered spots. Evans 19283; ESTC W38445

An extremely rare printing of the Land Ordinance of 1785, adopted by the United States Congress of the Confederation on May 20, 1785, one of the most significant pieces of congressional legislation and the prelude to the historic Northwest Ordinance of 1787. This landmark document set up a standardized system for the government to measure, divide, and facilitate the selling to settlers, undeveloped land in the Northwest Territory acquired from Great Britain at the end of the American Revolution (current day Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and the northeastern part of Minnesota). The Ordinance laid the foundation for government land policy, established the basis for the Public Land Survey System, and set the stage for organized westward expansion. It was largely an extension of the Ordinance of 1784, written by Thomas Jefferson, and debated in a committee comprised of Jefferson, Hugh Williamson, David Howell, Elbridge Gerry, and Jacob Read, and passed by Congress on April 23, 1784. The 1784 Ordinance called for the development of land north of the Ohio River, its division into separate states, and the means for establishing a temporary government (printed on the first page of this document). Among the chief purposes of these Ordinances was to address Congress’s need to raise much needed revenue for the government (due to its inability to levy taxes) by selling public land recently ceded to it by the individual states.

“The land Ordinance of 1784 was never implemented before it was superseded by the Ordinance of 1785. The latter was primarily designed to raise revenue toward payment of the public debt by selling land in the Old Northwest as soon as the Indians relinquished their claims and it was surveyed…The Ordinance of 1785 served as the primary legislation for a public land system. It called for a survey with a base line beginning at the point where the Ohio River intersected the western boundary of Pennsylvania and extending west for seven ranges (42 miles) and then south. Townships six miles square were made up of thirty-six sections, each one mile square (640 acres). Three sections of each township were reserved for public school use, another section for religious use, and other lands reserved for Continental officers, Canadian refugees, Virginia soldiers, and Christian Indians per agreement with Virginia. The land was to be sold at public auctions for not less than one dollar an acre, and certificates of pay to Revolutionary veterans would be acceptable at face value. Still needed was a process by which government would be established over this territory.” (Liberty’s Legacy: Our Celebration of the Northwest Ordinance and the United States Constitution, 1987, p. 31)

The 1785 Ordinance was debated in a committee established in March of that year, and comprised of one representative from each state. For a month, the committee, largely led by William Grayson of Virginia and Rufus King of Massachusetts, debated the ways to implement a standardized and fair system to survey and sell land that was acceptable to both Northern and Southern members of Congress. Both wanted to find a way to expand the Union without threatening their own states sovereignty. The committee’s decision to divide the land into a grid-like system of townships largely reflected the influence of the New England system of town planning, which saw the colony, town, or proprietor first survey the land into measured tracts to then be sold. Compared to this was the less ordered Southern system, which was largely a decentralized and individual initiative based around the idea of a farm and that saw buyers choose the swaths of land they desired first, followed by an official survey, and then purchase. This “metes and bounds” system typically relied on natural markers in the landscape that changed over time, and often led to boundary disputes, inimical to an orderly selling of federal land. In April, a report of the committee was read before Congress, and in the following month compromises were made, including the reduction of the size of townships from seven to six miles square. Importantly, the final draft of the Ordinance included a section requiring the proceeds of center lot 16 of each township be designated for the maintenance of a public school, as education was seen as essential for the permanency of the Union.

The initial land surveys were completed by Thomas Hutchins, Geographer of the United States (later called Surveyor-General), and others, in the Seven Ranges region in Eastern Ohio. Philadelphia scientist David Rittenhouse, and Col. Andrew Porter, established the first survey line at the Pennsylvania and Ohio borders. Public land auctions of some of the territory began in New York in 1787.

The Confederation government increasingly came up against problems when trying to put this Ordinance into motion: indigenous populations fighting to retain their land and hunting grounds from encroaching Americans, external pressure from Great Britain and Spain who meddled on the periphery of the territory and destabilized the region, and the Confederation’s general lack of power and resources to both raise a military to protect its settlers and establish control of the region. While the passage of the Northwest Ordinance in 1787 established a framework for government for the Northwest Territory, and outlined the mechanism for territories to enter the Union, it wasn’t until the Constitution was adopted the following year that the federal government was given the power to both enforce and put this Ordinance into true effect.

According to the Houghton Library at Harvard University, there are two printings of this document, one with and one without Secretary to the Confederation Congress, Charles Thomson’s printed signature. The National Archives has two copies, one with Thomson’s autograph signature in place of a printed one (LCC 90898211), and one without any signature (1943531). We have also located a Hartford, Connecticut printing by Hudson and Goodwin. That edition, with Thomson’s printed signature, was likely printed sometime after this edition.

We cannot locate any copies of any of these 1785 Ordinances ever being offered at auction.